VOA慢速英语听力 ECONOMICS REPORT(WORD文本):0312A.doc
- 1.请仔细阅读文档,确保文档完整性,对于不预览、不比对内容而直接下载带来的问题本站不予受理。
- 2.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
- 3、该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览)归上传者、原创作者;如果您是本文档原作者,请点此认领!既往收益都归您。
下载文档到电脑,查找使用更方便
8 0人已下载
| 下载 | 加入VIP,免费下载 |
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- VOA慢速英语听力 ECONOMICS REPORTWORD文本:0312A VOA 慢速 英语听力 REPORT WORD 文本 0312
- 资源描述:
-
1、标题:voa慢速英语讲解附字幕:联合公民组织为企业团体赢得言论自由对应音频:0312a.mp3听力内容:What Citizens United Does for US Companies, UnionsThis is the VOA Special English Economics Report.Laws in the United States and other countries treat a corporation like a person. We talked last week about how this idea developed a long time ago.In
2、 the United States, the Constitution protects freedom of speech. The Supreme Court has recognized that this is also true for corporations. But there was still a question about whether corporations could have the same freedom of political speech as real people do.During the two thousand eight preside
3、ntial campaign, a nonprofit corporation released a film critical of Hillary Clinton. The group, Citizens United, wanted to make Hillary: The Movie available on cable TV. But it did not want to violate a limit on so-called electioneering communication by corporations and unions within thirty days of
4、a primary election.Citizens United took the Federal Election Commission to court to fight the law.In January of this year, the Supreme Court, by the narrowest majority, voted five to four to end the ban. The ruling clears the way for corporations and unions to use their own money to support the elec
5、tion or defeat of a candidate. However, they are still barred from directly giving money to candidates. And the court did not consider the question of existing laws designed to prevent foreign influence in the political process.Since the nineteen forties, the traditional place for political speech b
6、y American unions and companies has been through political action committees. William Van Alstyne is a professor at the William and Mary Law School in Virginia.WILLIAM VAN ALSTYNE: If the shareholder felt it to their interest, if they wanted to contribute to a political action committee representing
7、 the business interest of the company, then they would contribute to the political action committee. Same thing on the labor side. So members of the union might be encouraged to contribute to the PAC - its called a P.A.C. The PAC would then determine how best to use the money, politically speaking,
8、in campaigns for and against candidates, ballot issues and all the rest.Now, says Professor Van Alstyne, the decision in Citizens United raises new issues. For example, the court will have to rule on whether companies with majority foreign ownership can enjoy the same expanded rights of political sp
9、eech.President Obama denounced the ruling in his State of the Union speech to Congress in January. This week, Chief Justice John Roberts told law students that anybody can criticize the Supreme Court. But, in answer to a question, he said the setting was very troubling. Six of the nine justices, inc
展开阅读全文
课堂库(九科星学科网)所有资源均是用户自行上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作他用。
链接地址:https://www.ketangku.com/wenku/file-340873.html


2019届人教A版数学必修二同步课后篇巩固探究:2-1-1 平面 WORD版含解析.docx
